linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 1/8] mm: Define coherent device memory node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <580E4043.4090200@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:09:23 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     mhocko@...e.com, js1304@...il.com, vbabka@...e.cz, mgorman@...e.de,
        minchan@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] mm: Define coherent device memory node

> +#ifdef CONFIG_COHERENT_DEVICE
> +#define node_cdm(nid)          (NODE_DATA(nid)->coherent_device)
> +#define set_cdm_isolation(nid) (node_cdm(nid) = 1)
> +#define clr_cdm_isolation(nid) (node_cdm(nid) = 0)
> +#define isolated_cdm_node(nid) (node_cdm(nid) == 1)
> +#else
> +#define set_cdm_isolation(nid) ()
> +#define clr_cdm_isolation(nid) ()
> +#define isolated_cdm_node(nid) (0)
> +#endif

FWIW, I think adding all this "cdm" gunk in the names is probably a bad
thing.

I can think of other memory types that are coherent, but
non-device-based that might want behavior like this.