[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1477269041.6373.41.camel@aj.id.au>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:00:41 +1030
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] pinctrl: aspeed-g4: Capture SuperIO pinmux
dependency
On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 00:09 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au> wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > Patch applied for v4.10.
> > > (Tell me if I'm applying patches in wrong order or something, and
> > > I hope this doesn't clash with the fixes.)
> > Both this patch and 8/8 functionally depend on 5/8. I fetched the
> > pinctrl tree to poke around but this patch didn't appear in any of the
> > updated branches, so I'm not sure whether we have the right ordering.
> > Without it we should hit build failures from missing macro definitions.
> >
> > Have you had a chance to look over patch 5/8? Joel wasn't keen on its
> > current form, so I would appreciate your input.
> Oops backed this patch out.
>
> Will look at 5/8.
>
> Appreciate if you repost the remaining patches in the series based on
> v4.9-rc2 once it's out, and I'll rebase the pinctrl tree onto that.
>
Will do!
Andrew
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists