lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 13:45:43 -0400 (EDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     tushar.n.dave@...cle.com
Cc:     chris.hyser@...cle.com, sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com,
        vgupta@...opsys.com, robin.murphy@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        egtvedt@...fundet.no, krzk@...nel.org, rkuo@...eaurora.org,
        sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sparc64: Add FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER and default to 13

From: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 11:12:02 -0700

> From: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
> 
> This change allows ATU (new IOMMU) in SPARC systems to request
> large (32M) contiguous memory during boot for creating IOTSB backing
> store.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Dave <tushar.n.dave@...cle.com>

If you need 32MB allocations, wouldn't a max zone order of 12 be
sufficient?  (8K << 12 == 32MB)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ