lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d656e9c9fbde7206e40a635c61a6084@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:24:24 +0530
From:   Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>
To:     Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, paolo.valente@...aro.org
Subject: RE: Device or HBA level QD throttling creates randomness in sequetial workload

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Omar Sandoval [mailto:osandov@...ndov.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 9:11 PM
> To: Kashyap Desai
> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> block@...r.kernel.org; axboe@...nel.dk; Christoph Hellwig;
> paolo.valente@...aro.org
> Subject: Re: Device or HBA level QD throttling creates randomness in
sequetial
> workload
>
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 06:35:01PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 05:43:35PM +0530, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > > > Hi -
> > > >
> > > > I found below conversation and it is on the same line as I wanted
> > > > some input from mailing list.
> > > >
> > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=147569860526197&w=2
> > > >
> > > > I can do testing on any WIP item as Omar mentioned in above
> > discussion.
> > > > https://github.com/osandov/linux/tree/blk-mq-iosched
> >
> > I tried build kernel using this repo, but looks like it is not allowed
> > to reboot due to some changes in <block> layer.
>
> Did you build the most up-to-date version of that branch? I've been
force
> pushing to it, so the commit id that you built would be useful.
> What boot failure are you seeing?

Below  is latest commit on repo.
commit b077a9a5149f17ccdaa86bc6346fa256e3c1feda
Author: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
Date:   Tue Sep 20 11:20:03 2016 -0700

    [WIP] blk-mq: limit bio queue depth

I have latest repo from 4.9/scsi-next maintained by Martin which boots
fine.  Only Delta is  " CONFIG_SBITMAP" is enabled in WIP blk-mq-iosched
branch. I could not see any meaningful data on boot hang, so going to try
one more time tomorrow.


>
> > >
> > > Are you using blk-mq for this disk? If not, then the work there
> > > won't
> > affect you.
> >
> > YES. I am using blk-mq for my test. I also confirm if use_blk_mq is
> > disable, Sequential work load issue is not seen and <cfq> scheduling
> > works well.
>
> Ah, okay, perfect. Can you send the fio job file you're using? Hard to
tell exactly
> what's going on without the details. A sequential workload with just one
> submitter is about as easy as it gets, so this _should_ be behaving
nicely.

<FIO script>

; setup numa policy for each thread
; 'numactl --show' to determine the maximum numa nodes
[global]
ioengine=libaio
buffered=0
rw=write
bssplit=4K/100
iodepth=256
numjobs=1
direct=1
runtime=60s
allow_mounted_write=0

[job1]
filename=/dev/sdd
..
[job24]
filename=/dev/sdaa

When I tune /sys/module/scsi_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq = 1, below is a
ioscheduler detail. (It is in blk-mq mode. )
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:02:00.0/host10/target10:2:13/10:
2:13:0/block/sdq/queue/scheduler:none

When I have set /sys/module/scsi_mod/parameters/use_blk_mq = 0,
ioscheduler picked by SML is <cfq>.
/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:02.0/0000:02:00.0/host10/target10:2:13/10:
2:13:0/block/sdq/queue/scheduler:noop deadline [cfq]

I see in blk-mq performance is very low for Sequential Write work load and
I confirm that blk-mq convert Sequential work load into random stream due
to  io-scheduler change in blk-mq vs legacy block layer.

>
> > >
> > > > Is there any workaround/alternative in latest upstream kernel, if
> > > > user wants to see limited penalty  for Sequential Work load on HDD
?
> > > >
> > > > ` Kashyap
> > > >
>
> P.S., your emails are being marked as spam by Gmail. Actually, Gmail
seems to
> mark just about everything I get from Broadcom as spam due to failed
DMARC.
>
> --
> Omar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ