lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024162633.olqhftj5tdsp6qwb@lukather>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:26:33 +0200
From:   Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To:     André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc:     Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: dts: add Allwinner A64 SoC .dtsi

Hi André,

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:57:04AM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> > +		pio: pinctrl@...0800 {
> > +			compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pinctrl";
> > +			reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
> > +			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +				     <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > +				     <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > +			clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PIO>;
> > +			gpio-controller;
> > +			#gpio-cells = <3>;
> > +			interrupt-controller;
> > +			#interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > +
> > +			i2c1_pins: i2c1_pins {
> > +				allwinner,pins = "PH2", "PH3";
> > +				allwinner,function = "i2c1";
> 
> So as Icenowy pointed out, we are missing the drive and pull properties
> here, at least as long as we don't have your patch (series) in place to
> cope with that.

Yeah sorry, we noticed first with Chen-Yu that the binding should not
need it, and then we realised that the driver was making the
assumption that they were... Sorry :/

> But if we rely on this series (which seems OK to me), shouldn't we then
> use the generic properties for pins and function here as well?

Definitely. I'll update this.

Thanks!
Maxime 

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ