[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024162633.olqhftj5tdsp6qwb@lukather>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:26:33 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: André Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] arm64: dts: add Allwinner A64 SoC .dtsi
Hi André,
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:57:04AM +0100, André Przywara wrote:
> > + pio: pinctrl@...0800 {
> > + compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-pinctrl";
> > + reg = <0x01c20800 0x400>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 17 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + clocks = <&ccu CLK_BUS_PIO>;
> > + gpio-controller;
> > + #gpio-cells = <3>;
> > + interrupt-controller;
> > + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> > +
> > + i2c1_pins: i2c1_pins {
> > + allwinner,pins = "PH2", "PH3";
> > + allwinner,function = "i2c1";
>
> So as Icenowy pointed out, we are missing the drive and pull properties
> here, at least as long as we don't have your patch (series) in place to
> cope with that.
Yeah sorry, we noticed first with Chen-Yu that the binding should not
need it, and then we realised that the driver was making the
assumption that they were... Sorry :/
> But if we rely on this series (which seems OK to me), shouldn't we then
> use the generic properties for pins and function here as well?
Definitely. I'll update this.
Thanks!
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists