[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161024230232.3527fd42@jawa>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 23:02:32 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@...o-electronics.de>,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] pwm: imx: Move PWMv2 software reset code to a
separate function
Hi Boris,
> On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:45:42 +0200
> Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl> wrote:
>
> > The software reset code has been extracted from imx_pwm_config_v2
> > function and moved to new one - imx_pwm_sw_reset().
> >
> > This change reduces the overall size of imx_pwm_config_v2() and
> > prepares it for atomic PWM operation.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
> > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Just a nit below ;).
>
> BTW, can't you just merge path 2 and 3?
I do prefer to have many small patches touching and changing just one
thing.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > index 83e43d5..fac5c93 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> > @@ -131,6 +131,25 @@ static void imx_pwm_disable_v1(struct pwm_chip
> > *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
> > }
> >
> > +static void imx_pwm_sw_reset(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> > +{
> > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
> > + struct device *dev = chip->dev;
> > + int wait_count = 0;
> > + u32 cr;
> > +
> > + writel(MX3_PWMCR_SWR, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> > + do {
> > + usleep_range(200, 1000);
> > + cr = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> > + } while ((cr & MX3_PWMCR_SWR) &&
> > + (wait_count++ < MX3_PWM_SWR_LOOP));
> > +
> > + if (cr & MX3_PWMCR_SWR)
> > + dev_warn(dev, "software reset timeout\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
> > {
> > @@ -140,7 +159,7 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> > *chip, unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale;
> > unsigned int period_ms;
> > bool enable = pwm_is_enabled(pwm);
> > - int wait_count = 0, fifoav;
> > + int fifoav;
> > u32 cr, sr;
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -162,17 +181,8 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip
> > *chip, if (fifoav == (sr & MX3_PWMSR_FIFOAV_MASK))
> > dev_warn(dev, "there is no free
> > FIFO slot\n"); }
> > - } else {
> > - writel(MX3_PWMCR_SWR, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> > - do {
> > - usleep_range(200, 1000);
> > - cr = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
> > - } while ((cr & MX3_PWMCR_SWR) &&
> > - (wait_count++ < MX3_PWM_SWR_LOOP));
> > -
> > - if (cr & MX3_PWMCR_SWR)
> > - dev_warn(dev, "software reset timeout\n");
> > - }
> > + } else
> > + imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip);
>
> } else {
> imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip);
> }
OK.
>
> >
> > c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
> > c = c * period_ns;
>
Best regards,
Ćukasz Majewski
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists