[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwE3x_w9+8SkHGBAGR5Du7P18+e55GWzcKOrORh87c7Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:50:18 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bio linked list corruption.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The vmalloc/vfree code itself is a bit scary. In particular, we have a
> rather insane model of TLB flushing. We leave the virtual area on a
> lazy purge-list, and we delay flushing the TLB and actually freeing
> the virtual memory for it so that we can batch things up.
Never mind. If DaveJ is running with DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, then the code in
vmap_debug_free_range() should have forced a synchronous TLB flush fro
vmalloc ranges too, so that doesn't explain it either.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists