linux-kernel - Re: linux.git: printk() problem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1477368827.1998.1.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 21:13:47 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Calvin Owens <calvinowens@...com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux.git: printk() problem

On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 13:06 +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>   so how about skipping mod_timer in deferred_cont_flush() and just
>   cont_flush() when we are in oops? here is probably one more thing we
>   need to "fix" first. oops_in_progress is unreliable. x86 oops_end()
>   does bust_spinlocks(0) before it calls panic(). panic() increments
>   oops_in_progress but decrements it back to 0 (bust_spinlocks(0)) before
>   it does console_flush_on_panic(). so there is (almost) no way
>   console_flush_on_panic() can see oops_in_progress != 0.

I think Linus' insistence on not requiring EOL/newline is misguided.
It'd be simpler to avoid the flushes and have a require EOL/newline.