[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161025044608.GA4929@obsidianresearch.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 22:46:08 -0600
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To: Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaiah.choudary.kalluri@...inx.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"michal.simek@...inx.com" <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com"
<ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v7, 1/3] nand: pl353: Add basic driver for arm pl353 smc nand
interface
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:58:49AM +0000, Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri wrote:
> > I have hacked the v7 patchset enough to work on 4.8 and hacked it some
> > more to work on my hardware. The driver appears to be in no better
> > shape than the 3.12 out-of-tree Xilinx release I was using previously..
>
> The driver in Xilinx tree works with 4.6 kernel and adopted the
> required
I mean, the driver from the 3.12 Xilinx tree that I last looked
at years ago. This is at v7 now and is still needs lots of work, I did
some fixing, including making parts of it work on 4.8.
You can copy it out of the patch I sent you.
> Changes (may release in 1-2 weeks). Still it need some rework, now a days
> I am seeing many requests from different people for this driver and some of
> Them are using different version of IP as you know this IP has four variants and
> Xilinx is using the pl353 variant.
Well, I am using Xilinx Zynq hardware and care about making that
configuration actually work. This is the last driver I require to use
Zynq with mainline.
It clearly needs more work than just forward porting to 4.8, so please
let me know if you are able to tackle this.
> Let's wait for the next series of patches and Get the patches tested
> with others as well along with the review comments.
You now have 10 review comments from me, please respond to all of them in
your v8 patchset - no sense in continuing to drag this out.
Please cc me on future series.
Jason
> Regards,
> Punnaiah
> > I've attached the ugly, ugly patch I made, it may save you some time
> > when preparing v8.
> >
> > Commentary:
> > 1) nand_chip already includes mtd_info, no reason for a second one in
> > the pl353_nand_info struct. The standard accessors mtd_to_nand/etc
> > should be used instead of priv
> > 2) I hacked out all the ECC stuff from the driver since I don't use
> > it and it was broken.. Obviously some has to come back, but fixing
> > other things on this list first will make that much easier and better..
> > 3) pl353_nand_write_page_swecc/pl353_nand_read_page_swecc are pure
> > outdated copies of the core routines and should not exist in a
> > driver. This needs to be fixed so nand_scan_tail sets them.
> > This seems to be a side effect of #9 ?
> > 4) The hacky stuff to detect 2 vs 3 address cycle NAND doesn't work,
> > and doesn't work without ONFI (see patch for possible fix). The
> > driver should probably use the same scheme the core code uses..
> > But this is all a problem because of #10
> > 5) The driver assumes alignment of the iomap, needs to use + not |
> > when constructing the address. (yes, this blows up on my system)
> > 6) Driver unconditionally sets timing to ONFI mode 0 (slow!)
> > Maybe timing should be common code driven by DT..
> > 7) Driver unconditionally selects a BBT format, and an ECC layout
> > (neither match what my system uses, but I guess that is a core mtd
> > issue these days :/)
> > 8) Driver unconditionally forces a chip-delay (wrong for my
> > system) maybe this should be common code driven by DT..
> > 9) This buisness with pl353_nand_ecc_init and the
> > special functions to do PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH stuff
> > is just horrid. I'd expect that is a big NAK.
> >
> > The driver needs to implement read_buf *properly* so the core
> > routines can be used instead of trying to 'fix' the call sites
> > to do the PL353_NAND_LAST_TRANSFER_LENGTH stuff.
> > 10) pl353_nand_cmd_function is a wonky copy of nand_command_lp,
> > maybe
> > this driver should use cmd_ctrl, or the core code should be
> > refactored some more..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists