[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161025072122.GA21708@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:21:22 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 18/43] block: define BIO_MAX_PAGES to HPAGE_PMD_NR if
huge page cache enabled
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 03:13:17AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We are going to do IO a huge page a time. So we need BIO_MAX_PAGES to be
> at least HPAGE_PMD_NR. For x86-64, it's 512 pages.
NAK. The maximum bio size should not depend on an obscure vm config,
please send a standalone patch increasing the size to the block list,
with a much long explanation. Also you can't simply increase the size
of the largers pool, we'll probably need more pools instead, or maybe
even implement a similar chaining scheme as we do for struct
scatterlist.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists