linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 17/17] ARM: dts: da850: add usb device node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:03:44 +0200
From:   Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 17/17] ARM: dts: da850: add usb device node

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:48 AM, David Lechner <david@...hnology.com> wrote:
> On 10/24/2016 11:46 AM, ahaslam@...libre.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
>>
>> This adds the usb (ohci) device node for the da850 soc.
>> Also it enables it for the lcdk board
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts | 8 ++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi     | 8 ++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
>> index 7b8ab21..fa91339 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850-lcdk.dts
>> @@ -86,6 +86,14 @@
>>         };
>>  };
>>
>> +&usb_phy {
>> +       status = "okay";
>> +};
>> +
>> +&usb {
>> +       status = "okay";
>
>
> Don't you need to specify a regulator here using the vbus-supply property?

its is not mandatory, the regulator framework is giving a dummy supply
on regulator_get if it does not find a regulator on device tree. That is
what i could understand from: _regulator_get in regulator/core.c

Also, in the case of platform based boot, if the board init calls
regulator_has_full_constraints which is anyways needed for the phy to probe
correctly it will also return a dummy regulator.


>
>> +};
>> +
>>  &serial2 {
>>         pinctrl-names = "default";
>>         pinctrl-0 = <&serial2_rxtx_pins>;
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index 33fcdce..ec2cec3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -381,6 +381,14 @@
>>                         #phy-cells = <1>;
>>                         status = "disabled";
>>                 };
>> +               usb: usb@...5000 {
>
>
> Don't need the leading 0 on usb@...000
>
> The alias (usb:) might need to be more specific since there is a second usb
> device that will be added later for musb. (The comments in the previous
> review only referred to the "usb" in "usb@", not the alias.)

ok.

>
>> +                       compatible = "ti,da830-ohci";
>> +                       reg = <0x225000 0x1000>;
>> +                       interrupts = <59>;
>> +                       phys = <&usb_phy 1>;
>> +                       phy-names = "usb-phy";
>> +                       status = "disabled";
>> +               };
>>                 gpio: gpio@...000 {
>>                         compatible = "ti,dm6441-gpio";
>>                         gpio-controller;
>>
>