[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdas+xK=Stoa+dbuQky6i4P3UqFbQcj4XawKmKjgw_thBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:16:04 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Gang Liu <gang.liu@....com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mpc8xxx: Correct irq handler function
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Gang Liu <gang.liu@....com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@....com> wrote:
>>
>> > From the beginning of the gpio-mpc8xxx.c, the "handle_level_irq"
>> > has being used to handle GPIO interrupts in the PowerPC/Layerscape
>> > platforms. But actually, almost all PowerPC/Layerscape platforms
>> > assert an interrupt request upon either a high-to-low change or any
>> > change on the state of the signal.
>> >
>> > So the "handle_level_irq" is not reasonable for PowerPC/Layerscape
>> > GPIO interrupt, it should be "handle_edge_irq". Otherwise the system
>> > may lost some interrupts from the PIN's state changes.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Liu Gang <Gang.Liu@....com>
>>
>> Yes and especially so since this irqchip implements .irq_ack() and unless you
>> use the edge handler it will never be called.
>>
>> Patch applied for fixes, tell me if it also needs to go into stable.
>>
> [Liu Gang] yes, please also put it into stable. Thanks!
Ooops too late. Will tell Greg to pick this separately.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists