[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161025102637.GB1768@shodan.usersys.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:26:37 +0200
From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Kirill Marinushkin <k.marinushkin@...il.com>,
paul.gortmaker@...driver.com, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] security/keys: make BIG_KEYS dependent on stdrng.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 03:50:54PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > > > IMO, the preferable fix depends on your future plan.
> > > > If you plan to continue using both ANSI X9.31 DRNG and DRBG - I agree with the
> > > > patch suggested by Artem Savkov.
> > > > If you plan to reduce using ANSI X9.31 DRNG and use DRBG more widely - I
> > > > suggest my patch.
> > >
> > > No such plans, TBH.
> >
> > I agre with Kirill here, so if we are not trying to reduce ANSI X9.31
> > DRNG usage can we move on with the suggested patch, or are there any
> > issues with it that need addressing?
>
> Which suggested patch? One of Kirill's (there are at least two) or yours?
I suggest mine, since it is more flexible.
> Note that we *also* need the "KEYS: Sort out big_key initialisation" patch -
> just changing the Kconfig is not sufficient a fix in and of itself.
Right, I see it also changes the Kconfig, so we might be better off with
v2 of "KEYS: Sort out big_key initialisation" with "depends on
(CRYPTO_ANSI_CPRNG = y || CRYPTO_DRBG = y)" in Kconfig.
--
Regards,
Artem
Powered by blists - more mailing lists