linux-kernel - Re: [Nouveau] noveau: emergency shutdown handling is overcomplex and broken

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Message-ID: <CAEXux-YC5CRsEXc0EKxVgEgcQEO6J9cu5WeeAvorTfUHEDcr-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 13:09:25 +0200
From:   Karol Herbst <karolherbst@...il.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        ML nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] noveau: emergency shutdown handling is overcomplex and broken

Thanks for the pointer.

But I don't like this patch. If you find a bug, make a bug report or
just fix it if you know the fix already. Or write something in IRC. Or
write on the Mailing list as a general question or something else

But I really don't agree on doing it this way. You would have needed
like the same amount of time to actual fix the problem.

Anyway, for adding a printk:

struct nvkm_subdev *subdev = &therm->subdev;
nvkm_error(subdev, "message");

2016-10-25 12:50 GMT+02:00 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c
> index b9703c0..adb1deb 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c
> @@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ nvkm_therm_sensor_event(struct nvkm_therm *therm, enum nvkm_therm_thrs thrs,
>                         struct work_struct *work;
>
>                         work = kmalloc(sizeof(*work), GFP_ATOMIC);
> +                       /* FIXME:
> +                          1) this is total overkill, orderly_poweroff() already
> +                          uses schedule_work internally
> +                          2) it would  be good to at least printk what is going on
> +                       */
>                         if (work) {
>                                 INIT_WORK(work, nv_poweroff_work);
>                                 schedule_work(work);
>
> GFP_ATOMIC is not reliable. Plus, see the fixme.
>
> Best regards,
>                                                                         Pavel
>
> --
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nouveau mailing list
> Nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives