linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 09/17] regulator: fixed: Add over current event

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKXjFTO3mEzdtGYr108TcSo8v8L+a2AhF49RaDaBADZSX4bK3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:07:17 +0200
From:   Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        manjunath.goudar@...aro.org,
        Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFT v2 09/17] regulator: fixed: Add over current event

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Axel Haslam wrote:
>>
>>> To be able to use regulator to handle the overcurrent pin, i need to be able
>>> to somehow retrieve the over current pin state from the regulator driver.
>>
>> What makes you say that, none of the existing users need this?
>>
>>> As i was trying your suggestion, i remembered why i thought i should use
>>> mode instead of status: Status seems to be for internal regulator driver use,
>>> there is no regulator_get_status, function and REGULATOR_STATUS_* are defined
>>> in driver.h and not in consumer.h as  REGULATOR_MODE_*
>>
>>> Would you be ok if i allow consumers to get the status via a new
>>> "regulator_get_status" call?
>>
>> What would they do with this information that they can't do with the
>> existing error notification?
>
> the usb core relies in two flags that need too be set properly, one is the
> over-current indicator RH_PS_POCI , and the other is the over current
> indicator "change" (RH_PS_OCIC).
>
> The idea was to use the notification to set the over current indicator
> "change" flag,
> which will happen for both rising and falling edges. And to use
> get_status or get_mode
> to set the over-current indicator flag which should reflect the actual
> pin status.
>

BTW, for the notification, i should have used a new event flag
something like: OVER_CURRENT_CHANGED and not just OVER_CURRENT


Regards
Axel

>
> -Axel.