| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.11.1610250945390.24191@mail.ewheeler.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:55:21 -0700 (PDT)
From: Eric Wheeler <bcache@...ts.ewheeler.net>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ciao set_task_state() (was Re: [PATCH -v4 6/8] locking/mutex:
Restructure wait loop)
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 06:57:26PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: sched: Better explain sleep/wakeup
> > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Date: Wed Oct 19 15:45:27 CEST 2016
> > >
> > > There were a few questions wrt how sleep-wakeup works. Try and explain
> > > it more.
> > >
> > > Requested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > ---
> > > include/linux/sched.h | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> > > kernel/sched/core.c | 15 +++++++-------
> > > 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > > @@ -262,20 +262,9 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!
> > > #define set_task_state(tsk, state_value) \
> > > do { \
> > > (tsk)->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
> > > - smp_store_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value)); \
> > > + smp_store_mb((tsk)->state, (state_value)); \
> > > } while (0)
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state
> > > - * is correctly serialised wrt the caller's subsequent test of whether to
> > > - * actually sleep:
> > > - *
> > > - * set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> > > - * if (do_i_need_to_sleep())
> > > - * schedule();
> > > - *
> > > - * If the caller does not need such serialisation then use __set_current_state()
> > > - */
> > > #define __set_current_state(state_value) \
> > > do { \
> > > current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
> > > @@ -284,11 +273,19 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!
> > > #define set_current_state(state_value) \
> > > do { \
> > > current->task_state_change = _THIS_IP_; \
> > > - smp_store_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \
> > > + smp_store_mb(current->state, (state_value)); \
> > > } while (0)
> > >
> > > #else
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * @tsk had better be current, or you get to keep the pieces.
> >
> > That reminds me we were getting rid of the set_task_state() calls. Bcache was
> > pending, being only user in the kernel that doesn't actually use current; but
> > instead breaks newly (yet blocked/uninterruptible) created garbage collection
> > kthread. I cannot figure out why this is done (ie purposely accounting the
> > load avg. Furthermore gc kicks in in very specific scenarios obviously, such
> > as as by the allocator task, so I don't see why bcache gc should want to be
> > interruptible.
> >
> > Kent, Jens, can we get rid of this?
>
> Here's a patch that just fixes the way gc gets woken up. Eric, you want to take
> this?
Sure, I'll put it up with my -rc2 pull request to Jens.
A couple of sanity checks (for my understanding at least):
Why does bch_data_insert_start() no longer need to call
set_gc_sectors(op->c) now that bch_cache_set_alloc and bch_gc_thread do?
Does bch_cache_set_alloc() even need to call set_gc_sectors since
bch_gc_thread() does before calling bch_btree_gc?
Also I'm curious, why change invalidate_needs_gc from a bitfield?
-Eric
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] bcache: Make gc wakeup saner
>
> This lets us ditch a set_task_state() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.h | 3 +--
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 4 +---
> drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 ++
> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> index 6b420a55c7..c3ea03c9a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ struct cache {
> * until a gc finishes - otherwise we could pointlessly burn a ton of
> * cpu
> */
> - unsigned invalidate_needs_gc:1;
> + unsigned invalidate_needs_gc;
>
> bool discard; /* Get rid of? */
>
> @@ -593,8 +593,8 @@ struct cache_set {
>
> /* Counts how many sectors bio_insert has added to the cache */
> atomic_t sectors_to_gc;
> + wait_queue_head_t gc_wait;
>
> - wait_queue_head_t moving_gc_wait;
> struct keybuf moving_gc_keys;
> /* Number of moving GC bios in flight */
> struct semaphore moving_in_flight;
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> index 81d3db40cd..2efdce0724 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
> @@ -1757,32 +1757,34 @@ static void bch_btree_gc(struct cache_set *c)
> bch_moving_gc(c);
> }
>
> -static int bch_gc_thread(void *arg)
> +static bool gc_should_run(struct cache_set *c)
> {
> - struct cache_set *c = arg;
> struct cache *ca;
> unsigned i;
>
> - while (1) {
> -again:
> - bch_btree_gc(c);
> + for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
> + if (ca->invalidate_needs_gc)
> + return true;
>
> - set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> - if (kthread_should_stop())
> - break;
> + if (atomic_read(&c->sectors_to_gc) < 0)
> + return true;
>
> - mutex_lock(&c->bucket_lock);
> + return false;
> +}
>
> - for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
> - if (ca->invalidate_needs_gc) {
> - mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);
> - set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> - goto again;
> - }
> +static int bch_gc_thread(void *arg)
> +{
> + struct cache_set *c = arg;
>
> - mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);
> + while (1) {
> + wait_event_interruptible(c->gc_wait,
> + kthread_should_stop() || gc_should_run(c));
>
> - schedule();
> + if (kthread_should_stop())
> + break;
> +
> + set_gc_sectors(c);
> + bch_btree_gc(c);
> }
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1790,11 +1792,10 @@ static int bch_gc_thread(void *arg)
>
> int bch_gc_thread_start(struct cache_set *c)
> {
> - c->gc_thread = kthread_create(bch_gc_thread, c, "bcache_gc");
> + c->gc_thread = kthread_run(bch_gc_thread, c, "bcache_gc");
> if (IS_ERR(c->gc_thread))
> return PTR_ERR(c->gc_thread);
>
> - set_task_state(c->gc_thread, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
> index 5c391fa01b..9b80417cd5 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
> @@ -260,8 +260,7 @@ void bch_initial_mark_key(struct cache_set *, int, struct bkey *);
>
> static inline void wake_up_gc(struct cache_set *c)
> {
> - if (c->gc_thread)
> - wake_up_process(c->gc_thread);
> + wake_up(&c->gc_wait);
> }
>
> #define MAP_DONE 0
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index 40ffe5e424..a37c1776f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -196,10 +196,8 @@ static void bch_data_insert_start(struct closure *cl)
> struct data_insert_op *op = container_of(cl, struct data_insert_op, cl);
> struct bio *bio = op->bio, *n;
>
> - if (atomic_sub_return(bio_sectors(bio), &op->c->sectors_to_gc) < 0) {
> - set_gc_sectors(op->c);
> + if (atomic_sub_return(bio_sectors(bio), &op->c->sectors_to_gc) < 0)
> wake_up_gc(op->c);
> - }
>
> if (op->bypass)
> return bch_data_invalidate(cl);
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> index 849ad441cd..66669c8f41 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
> @@ -1491,6 +1491,7 @@ struct cache_set *bch_cache_set_alloc(struct cache_sb *sb)
> mutex_init(&c->bucket_lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&c->btree_cache_wait);
> init_waitqueue_head(&c->bucket_wait);
> + init_waitqueue_head(&c->gc_wait);
> sema_init(&c->uuid_write_mutex, 1);
>
> spin_lock_init(&c->btree_gc_time.lock);
> @@ -1550,6 +1551,7 @@ static void run_cache_set(struct cache_set *c)
>
> for_each_cache(ca, c, i)
> c->nbuckets += ca->sb.nbuckets;
> + set_gc_sectors(c);
>
> if (CACHE_SYNC(&c->sb)) {
> LIST_HEAD(journal);
> --
> 2.9.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists