linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom opp_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:01:14 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, nm@...com,
        Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, robh@...nel.org,
        d-gerlach@...com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom
 opp_set_rate() callbacks

On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The generic opp_set_rate() handler isn't sufficient for platforms with
> complex DVFS.  For example, some TI platforms have multiple regulators
> for a CPU device. The order in which various supplies need to be
> programmed is only known to the platform code and its best to leave it
> to it.
> 
> This patch implements APIs to register platform specific opp_set_rate()
> callback.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---

Overall it looks ok, but I'd prefer set_opp instead of set_rate.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project