linux-kernel - [DOC] Missing completions-design.txt?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161025195000.GA17604@localhost>
Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:50:01 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@...r.at>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [DOC] Missing completions-design.txt?

Hi,

It looks like Nicholas submitted this doc a while back as patch 2/2:

"[PATCH 2/2] doc: detailed documentation for completion"
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1412.2/03676.html

where patch 1/2 got merged as this:

202799be447b doc: brief user documentation for completion

References in the introduced completion.txt doc have pointed lost souls
at an elusive completion-design.txt:

  "for details on completion design and implementation see
  completions-design.txt"

Since as we well know, most developers are religious readers of
documentation, presumably there are people out there waiting expectantly
for such a file to appear in their otherwise exhaustive Documentation/.
Can you help such lost souls out?

Thanks,
Brian

P.S. I haven't actually read the design doc that closely yet. Who would
trust such a random patch off the archives, after all? So just removing
the mention of this file might be a satisfactory solution.