linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARC: SMP: Use "unsigned virq" in smp_ipi_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ceff7ce9-4de3-f0f4-61b9-1afdb3e837a0@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:28:58 -0700
From:   Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@...opsys.com>,
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>, <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        <tglx@...utronix.de>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ARC: SMP: Use "unsigned virq" in smp_ipi_irq_setup
 instead of "signed irq"

On 10/24/2016 05:46 AM, Yuriy Kolerov wrote:
> This function takes a cpu number and a virq number and registers an
> appropriate handler per cpu. However smp_ipi_irq_setup is incorrectly
> used in several places of ARC platform code - hwirq is passed instead
> of virq. This patch is intended to clarify declaration of virq argument
> to prevent passing of hwirq instead of virq in future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yuriy Kolerov <yuriy.kolerov@...opsys.com>
> ---
>  arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h | 4 ++--
>  arch/arc/kernel/smp.c      | 8 ++++----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h b/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h
> index 89fdd1b..3ebebbc 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h
> +++ b/arch/arc/include/asm/smp.h
> @@ -37,9 +37,9 @@ extern const char *arc_platform_smp_cpuinfo(void);
>   * API expected BY platform smp code (FROM arch smp code)
>   *
>   * smp_ipi_irq_setup:
> - *	Takes @cpu and @irq to which the arch-common ISR is hooked up
> + *	Takes @cpu and @virq to which the arch-common ISR is hooked up

If you agree to my comment on 2/5, then yeah change here to say hwirq, but IMO
this can be squashed with 2/5.

>   */
> -extern int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, int irq);
> +extern int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, unsigned int virq);
>  
>  /*
>   * struct plat_smp_ops	- SMP callbacks provided by platform to ARC SMP
> diff --git a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> index f183cc6..ec4d956 100644
> --- a/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/arch/arc/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ irqreturn_t do_IPI(int irq, void *dev_id)
>   */
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, ipi_dev);
>  
> -int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, int irq)
> +int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, unsigned int virq)
>  {
>  	int *dev = per_cpu_ptr(&ipi_dev, cpu);
>  
> @@ -359,12 +359,12 @@ int smp_ipi_irq_setup(int cpu, int irq)
>  	if (!cpu) {
>  		int rc;
>  
> -		rc = request_percpu_irq(irq, do_IPI, "IPI Interrupt", dev);
> +		rc = request_percpu_irq(virq, do_IPI, "IPI Interrupt", dev);
>  		if (rc)
> -			panic("Percpu IRQ request failed for %d\n", irq);
> +			panic("Percpu IRQ request failed for %d\n", virq);
>  	}
>  
> -	enable_percpu_irq(irq, 0);
> +	enable_percpu_irq(virq, 0);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>