linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix-timers: make it configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161026201828.GA25143@localhost.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:18:28 +0200
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@...e.fr>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] posix-timers: make it configurable

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:56:13AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> So if my Fedora usage doesn't need them, we can infer that 
> the number of embedded systems also not needing them might tend towards 
> a high percentage.

(I wouldn't call Fedora an embedded distro, but heh...)

> But let's be conservative and say "some".

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Richard