linux-kernel - Re: bio linked list corruption.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFyyP6VHOv6KbhVdMMtNfJLftbju_Ui2GNxXt0GgkKm0Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:51:01 -0700
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: Re: bio linked list corruption.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:40 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> wrote:
>
> I gave it a shot too for shits & giggles.
> This falls out during boot.
>
> [    9.278420] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at block/blk-mq.c:1181 blk_sq_make_request+0x465/0x4a0

Hmm. That's the

    WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->mq_ctx != ctx);

that I added to blk_mq_merge_queue_io(), and I really think that
warning is valid, and the fact that it triggers shows that something
is wrong with locking.

We just did a

                spin_lock(&ctx->lock);

and that lock is *supposed* to protect the __blk_mq_insert_request(),
but that uses rq->mq_ctx.

So if rq->mq_ctx != ctx, then we're locking the wrong context.

Jens - please explain to me why I'm wrong.

Or maybe I actually might have found the problem? In which case please
send me a patch that fixes it ;)

Dave: it might be a good idea to split that "WARN_ON_ONCE()" in
blk_mq_merge_queue_io() into two, since right now it can trigger both
for the

                blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);

path _and_ for the

                if (!blk_mq_attempt_merge(q, ctx, bio)) {
                        blk_mq_bio_to_request(rq, bio);
                        goto insert_rq;

path. If you split it into two: one before that "insert_rq:" label,
and one before the "goto insert_rq" thing, then we could see if it is
just one of the blk_mq_merge_queue_io() cases (or both) that is
broken..

                  Linus