[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161026231402.tijzwdjnfvt7p3q5@jeyu>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:14:02 -0700
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling
+++ Jiri Kosina [26/10/16 10:17 +0200]:
>On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Rusty Russell wrote:
>
>> >> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the
>> >> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency
>> >> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's
>> >> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do
>> >> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's
>> >> approval :-)), no?
>> >
>> > I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't
>> > reposnded so far.
>>
>> I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her
>> Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree.
>
>Awesome! :)
>
>> Lazy, huh?
>
>Laziness has always been the main power behind all the progress of the
>mankind :P
>
>Jessica, do you want me to take the patch through livepatching tree still,
>or would you route it yourself now?
Hi Jiri,
Once I'm done fumbling with maintainership logistics, I will take this
patch through my tree. :-)
Thanks,
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists