lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:19:36 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] docs: Tweak submitting-patches.rst formatting

The main goal here was to get the subsections to show in the TOC as they do
for all the other documents.  Also call out the DCO in the section title
since it's important.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
---
 Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst | 16 ++++++----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
index b4cf8f375184..3e10719fee35 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 .. _submittingpatches:
 
-How to Get Your Change Into the Linux Kernel or Care And Operation Of Your Linus Torvalds
-=========================================================================================
+Submitting patches: the essential guide to getting your code into the kernel
+============================================================================
 
 For a person or company who wishes to submit a change to the Linux
 kernel, the process can sometimes be daunting if you're not familiar
@@ -24,10 +24,6 @@ of the mechanical work done for you, though you'll still need to prepare
 and document a sensible set of patches.  In general, use of ``git`` will make
 your life as a kernel developer easier.
 
-Creating and Sending your Change
-********************************
-
-
 0) Obtain a current source tree
 -------------------------------
 
@@ -417,8 +413,8 @@ e-mail discussions.
 
 
 
-11) Sign your work
-------------------
+11) Sign your work — the Developer's Certificate of Origin
+----------------------------------------------------------
 
 To improve tracking of who did what, especially with patches that can
 percolate to their final resting place in the kernel through several
@@ -803,8 +799,8 @@ command like this will do the trick::
   git request-pull master git://my.public.tree/linux.git my-signed-tag
 
 
-REFERENCES
-**********
+References
+----------
 
 Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
   <http://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/stuff/tpp.txt>
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ