[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161026073619.GB1128@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:36:19 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 18/43] block: define BIO_MAX_PAGES to HPAGE_PMD_NR if
huge page cache enabled
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:13:13PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> Why wouldn't you have all the pool sizes in between? Definitely 1MB has
> been too small already for high-bandwidth IO. I wouldn't mind BIOs up to
> 4MB or larger since most high-end RAID hardware does best with 4MB IOs.
I/O sizes are not limited by the bio size, we can already support larger
than 1MB I/O for a long time.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists