[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a8dr535g.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:37:23 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: taint/module: Clean up global and module taint flags handling
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org> writes:
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
>> Hm, quick question, which tree would this patch go to? Though the
>> cleanup is for modules, there is an indirect cross-tree dependency
>> (taint_flag.module needs to be true for TAINT_LIVEPATCH for Josh's
>> patch to still work as intended). The least complicated thing to do
>> would be to just take this through the livepatch tree (with Rusty's
>> approval :-)), no?
>
> I don't want to be sneaking this behind Rusty's back, but he hasn't
> reposnded so far.
I finally side-stepped this by appointing Jessica maintainer, thus her
Reviewed-by is sufficient for the module tree.
Lazy, huh?
Sorry for the delay,
Rusty.
> It's not vitally super-crucial to have this present in this very pull
> request, so I am currently putting this on hold wrt. the upcoming merge
> window pull request, and we'll then proceeed afterwards once Rusty
> expressess his (n)ack. If this doesn't happen during the coming weeks,
> I'll pick this up myself.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Jiri Kosina
> SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists