linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] x86/msr: Add write msr notrace to avoid the debug codes splash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58b4733f-38c0-a279-5d1d-789487317af0@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:24:38 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] x86/msr: Add write msr notrace to avoid the debug
 codes splash



On 26/10/2016 10:02, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> I see. notrace static void kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write_notrace(u32 reg,
> u32 val) and notrace static void kvm_guest_apic_eoi_write(u32 reg, u32
> val), which one you prefer?

The latter is okay.

Paolo