[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161026121329.GR8574@dell>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 13:13:29 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc: thierry.reding@...il.com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
tomi.valkeinen@...com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] backlight: pwm_bl: Check the pwm state for initial
backlight power state
On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> If the pwm is not enabled the backlight initially should not be enabled
> either if we have booted with DT and there is a phandle pointing to the
> backlight node.
>
> The patch extends the checks to decide if we should keep the backlight off
> initially.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
> ---
> drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Makes sense to me.
I'm going to apply this until someone screams at me.
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 9bc4715bf116..e4326bbf807f 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -223,6 +223,10 @@ static int pwm_backlight_initial_power_state(const struct pwm_bl_data *pb)
> if (!regulator_is_enabled(pb->power_supply))
> return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
>
> + /* The pwm is disabled, keep it like this */
> + if (!pwm_is_enabled(pb->pwm))
> + return FB_BLANK_POWERDOWN;
> +
> return FB_BLANK_UNBLANK;
> }
>
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists