linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.4 085/112] sd: Fix rw_max for devices that report an optimal xfer size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20161026122308.364021470@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:23:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@....com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 085/112] sd: Fix rw_max for devices that report an optimal xfer size

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>

commit 6b7e9cde49691e04314342b7dce90c67ad567fcc upstream.

For historic reasons, io_opt is in bytes and max_sectors in block layer
sectors. This interface inconsistency is error prone and should be
fixed. But for 4.4--4.7 let's make the unit difference explicit via a
wrapper function.

Fixes: d0eb20a863ba ("sd: Optimal I/O size is in bytes, not sectors")
Reported-by: Fam Zheng <famz@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Tested-by: Andrew Patterson <andrew.patterson@....com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@....com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/scsi/sd.c |    8 ++++----
 drivers/scsi/sd.h |    5 +++++
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -2879,10 +2879,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gen
 	if (sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks &&
 	    sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= dev_max &&
 	    sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks <= SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS &&
-	    sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size >= PAGE_CACHE_SIZE)
-		rw_max = q->limits.io_opt =
-			sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks * sdp->sector_size;
-	else
+	    logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks) >= PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) {
+		q->limits.io_opt = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
+		rw_max = logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks);
+	} else
 		rw_max = BLK_DEF_MAX_SECTORS;
 
 	/* Combine with controller limits */
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.h
@@ -151,6 +151,11 @@ static inline sector_t logical_to_sector
 	return blocks << (ilog2(sdev->sector_size) - 9);
 }
 
+static inline unsigned int logical_to_bytes(struct scsi_device *sdev, sector_t blocks)
+{
+	return blocks * sdev->sector_size;
+}
+
 /*
  * A DIF-capable target device can be formatted with different
  * protection schemes.  Currently 0 through 3 are defined: