linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/7] mfd: tps65217: Fix mismatched interrupt number

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:56:31 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
Cc:     bcousson@...libre.com, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mfd: tps65217: Fix mismatched interrupt number

On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Milo Kim wrote:

> Enum value of 'tps65217_irq_type' is not matched with DT parsed hwirq
> number[*].
> 
> The MFD driver gets the IRQ data by referencing hwirq, but the value is
> different. So, irq_to_tps65217_irq() returns mismatched IRQ data.
> Eventually, the power button driver enables not PB but USB interrupt
> when it is probed.
> 
> According to the TPS65217 register map[**], USB interrupt is the LSB.
> This patch synchronizes TPS65217 IRQ index.
> 
> [*]  include/dt-bindings/mfd/tps65217.h
> [**] http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/tps65217.pdf
> 
> Signed-off-by: Milo Kim <woogyom.kim@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mfd/tps65217.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/tps65217.h b/include/linux/mfd/tps65217.h
> index 4ccda89..75a3a5f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mfd/tps65217.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mfd/tps65217.h
> @@ -235,9 +235,9 @@ struct tps65217_bl_pdata {
>  };
>  
>  enum tps65217_irq_type {
> -	TPS65217_IRQ_PB,
> -	TPS65217_IRQ_AC,
>  	TPS65217_IRQ_USB,
> +	TPS65217_IRQ_AC,
> +	TPS65217_IRQ_PB,
>  	TPS65217_NUM_IRQ
>  };

This is why using enum for these types of assignments is sometimes
dangerous.  It's probably best to be explicit.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog