[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b9bfc4aa-ef52-53c4-dc7e-c0bc1c5969fb@lechnology.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:08:36 -0500
From: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node
On 10/25/2016 10:06 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> Add a syscon node for the SoC CFGCHIPn registers. This is needed for
> the new usb phy driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> index f79e1b9..6bbf20d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@
> };
>
> };
> + cfgchip: cfgchip@...7c {
I wonder if there is a more generic name instead of cfgchip@. Is there a
preferred generic name for syscon nodes?
> + compatible = "ti,da830-cfgchip", "syscon";
> + reg = <0x1417c 0x14>;
> + };
> edma0: edma@0 {
> compatible = "ti,edma3-tpcc";
> /* eDMA3 CC0: 0x01c0 0000 - 0x01c0 7fff */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists