linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool: fix rare switch jump table pattern detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161026164530.a7xzjtwk42ymfnqg@treble>
Date:   Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:45:30 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool: fix rare switch jump table pattern detection

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 06:03:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 26, 2016 10:34:08 AM CEST Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The following commit:
> > 
> >   3732710ff6f2 ("objtool: Improve rare switch jump table pattern detection")
> > 
> > ... improved objtool's ability to detect gcc switch statement jump
> > tables for gcc 6.  However the check to allow short jumps with the
> > scanned range of instructions wasn't quite right.  The pattern detection
> > should allow jumps to the indirect jump instruction itself.
> > 
> > This fixes the following warning:
> > 
> >   drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_comp.o: warning: objtool: rxe_completer()+0x315: sibling call from callable instruction with changed frame pointer
> > 
> > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Fixes: 3732710ff6f2 ("objtool: Improve rare switch jump table pattern detection")
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
> 
> Tested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> 
> It fixes the mlx4/resource_tracker.o problem, but not the other
> one for ttusb-dec/ttusb_dec.o, as you mentioned.
> 
> Do you need any more help creating a testcase for that one?

No, I can recreate the ttusb_dec.o warning with the config you gave me
for this one.  Thanks!

-- 
Josh