[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161026060743.GK9162@vireshk-i7>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:37:43 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, nm@...com,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, robh@...nel.org,
d-gerlach@...com, broonie@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 7/8] PM / OPP: Allow platform specific custom
opp_set_rate() callbacks
On 25-10-16, 12:01, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 10/20, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > The generic opp_set_rate() handler isn't sufficient for platforms with
> > complex DVFS. For example, some TI platforms have multiple regulators
> > for a CPU device. The order in which various supplies need to be
> > programmed is only known to the platform code and its best to leave it
> > to it.
> >
> > This patch implements APIs to register platform specific opp_set_rate()
> > callback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> > ---
>
> Overall it looks ok, but I'd prefer set_opp instead of set_rate.
Done.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists