linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161027062121.ofj2whaaohokfswb@phenom.ffwll.local>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:21:33 +0200
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
To:     Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, airlied@...ux.ie,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, zhi.a.wang@...el.com
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 09:09:33PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > There will probably be no linux-next releases next week while I attend
> > the Kernel Summit.
> >
> > Changes since 20161024:
> >
> > The pm tree gained a conflict against the imx-mxs tree.
> >
> > The mali-dp tree gained a conflict against the drm-misc tree.
> >
> > The sunxi tree gained a build failure so I used the version from
> > next-20161024.
> >
> > The akpm-current tree still had its build failures for which I applied
> > 2 patches.
> >
> > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 2174
> >  2622 files changed, 187829 insertions(+), 38953 deletions(-)
> 
> The i386 allmodconfig fails with bad 32/64 math for about the last 5 days.
> 
> ERROR: "__umoddi3" [drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko] undefined!
> 
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12840554/
> 
> git bisect says:
> 
> first bad commit: [4d60c5fd3f8751ea751d6dc6cfe0c1620420ccf8]
> drm/i915/gvt: vGPU PCI configuration space virtualization
> 
> Authors/maintainers added to Cc/To list.   Guessing folks weren't
> aware of the regression.

The fix is in-flight. Thanks anyway for the report.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch