[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1477549785-4972-7-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:29:42 +0200
From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Lothar Wassmann <LW@...o-electronics.de>,
Bhuvanchandra DV <bhuvanchandra.dv@...adex.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/10] pwm: imx: Provide atomic PWM support for i.MX PWMv2
This commit provides apply() callback implementation for i.MX's PWMv2.
Suggested-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
---
Changes for v2:
- None
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
index f7c7534..6b7d2f1 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
@@ -174,6 +174,81 @@ static void imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(struct pwm_chip *chip,
}
}
+static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+ struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+ unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale;
+ struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip);
+ struct pwm_state cstate;
+ unsigned long long c;
+ u32 cr = 0;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ pwm_get_state(pwm, &cstate);
+
+ c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per);
+ c *= state->period;
+
+ do_div(c, 1000000000);
+ period_cycles = c;
+
+ prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1;
+
+ period_cycles /= prescale;
+ c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * state->duty_cycle;
+ do_div(c, state->period);
+ duty_cycles = c;
+
+ /*
+ * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be
+ * PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2.
+ */
+ if (period_cycles > 2)
+ period_cycles -= 2;
+ else
+ period_cycles = 0;
+
+ /* Enable the clock if the PWM is being enabled. */
+ if (state->enabled && !cstate.enabled) {
+ ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for a free FIFO slot if the PWM is already enabled, and flush
+ * the FIFO if the PWM was disabled and is about to be enabled.
+ */
+ if (cstate.enabled)
+ imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm);
+ else if (state->enabled)
+ imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip);
+
+ writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR);
+ writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR);
+
+ cr |= MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) |
+ MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN |
+ MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH;
+
+ if (state->enabled)
+ cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN;
+
+ writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR);
+
+ /* Disable the clock if the PWM is being disabled. */
+ if (!state->enabled && cstate.enabled)
+ clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per);
+
+ clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip,
struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns)
{
@@ -297,6 +372,7 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = {
.enable = imx_pwm_enable,
.disable = imx_pwm_disable,
.config = imx_pwm_config,
+ .apply = imx_pwm_apply_v2,
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
};
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists