[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161027131027.GB1016@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:10:28 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Roman Pen <roman.penyaev@...fitbricks.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] kthread: allocate kthread structure using
kmalloc
On 10/26, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:14:00PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * TODO: kill it and use to_kthread(). But we still need the users
> > + * like kthread_stop() which has to sync with the exiting kthread.
> > + */
> > static struct kthread *to_live_kthread(struct task_struct *k)
>
> Now that the kthread struct is no longer on the stack, are the
> try_get_task_stack() and its corresponding put_task_stack()'s still
> needed?
It seems you missed this part
Of course, with this patch we are ready to remove
put_task_stack() from kthread.c right now. The next change should kill
to_live_kthread() altogether.
in the same email ;)
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists