[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <20161027074401.wxg5icc6hcpwnfsf@gangnam.samsung>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:44:01 +0900
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To: Sean Young <sean@...s.org>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andi Shyti <andi@...zian.org>,
David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] [media] ir-lirc-codec: don't wait any transmitting
time for tx only devices
Hi Sean,
it's been a while :)
I was going through your review fixing what needs to be fixed,
but...
> > @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static ssize_t ir_lirc_transmit_ir(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> > }
> >
> > ret = dev->tx_ir(dev, txbuf, count);
> > - if (ret < 0)
> > + if (ret < 0 || dev->driver_type == RC_DRIVER_IR_RAW_TX)
>
> Just because a driver only does transmit doesn't mean its transmit ABI
> should change.
>
> Now this bit of code is pretty horrible. It ensures that the call to write()
> takes at least as long as the length of the transmit IR by sleeping. That's
> not much of a guarantee that the IR has been sent.
>
> Note that in the case of ir-spi, since your spi transfer is sync no sleep
> should be introduced here.
>
> The gap calculation in lirc checks that if the call to write() took _longer_
> than expected wait before sending the next IR code (when either multiple
> IR codes or repeats are specified). Introducing the sleep in the kernel
> here does not help at all, lirc already ensures that it waits as long as
> the IR is long (see schedule_repeat_timer in lirc).
>
> This change was introduced in 3.10, commit f8e00d5.
... I'm not sure what can be done here. I get your point and I
understand that this indeed is a kind of fake sync point and by
doing this I
How about creating two different functions:
- ir_lirc_transmit_ir where we actually do what the function
already does
- ir_lirc_transmit_no_sync where the function we don't wait
because the the sync is done on a different level (for example
in the SPI case).
SPI does approximately the same thing.
Andi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists