linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding for meson GPIO interrupt controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161027093205.GA27135@leverpostej>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:32:05 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: add DT binding
 for meson GPIO interrupt controller

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 04:42:35PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 05:21:13PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> > 
> > This commit adds the device tree bindings description for Amlogic's GPIO
> > interrupt controller available on the meson8, meson8b and gxbb SoC families
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
> > ---
> > Rob, I did not include the Ack you gave for the RFC as bindings have slightly
> > changed. Only the interrupt property has be removed following a discussion I
> > had with Marc
> 
> As Mark R already said, you should keep the interrupts property.

To be clear, the interrupt routing should be described *somehow*, though
I don't think the generic interrupts property is correct, as this is an
interrupt *router*, i.e. this device doesn't own the interrupt, it just
joins two parts of the line together (and so flags are meaningless).

Thanks,
Mark.