[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161027145425.x6idpcrq6nbhmihv@kwain>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:54:25 +0200
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] of: introduce the overlay manager
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:49:29AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>
> I agree - something like this should have attracted more reviews. I
> suggest providing a better explanation, i.e what you are doing and why
> in more details. I reviewed your set and I'm still not sure of
> exactly what it does, hence not being able to comment on the validity
> of the approach.
>
> I'm pretty sure there is value in what you are suggesting, it's a
> matter of getting people to understand the approach and motivation.
That's what I tried to do in the cover-letter. What do you think is
missing that I should add in it?
Thanks,
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists