linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: davinci: enable LEDs default-on trigger in default config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be478f0a-bd10-7241-7e9d-20dfc1beaa30@lechnology.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:49:57 -0500
From:   David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
To:     Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ARM: davinci: enable LEDs default-on trigger in
 default config

On 10/27/2016 06:29 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Saturday 22 October 2016 12:06 AM, David Lechner wrote:
>> The LEDs default-on trigger is nice to have. For example, it can be used
>> to configure a LED as a power indicator.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig
>> index 9d7f0bc..e380743 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/davinci_all_defconfig
>> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ CONFIG_LEDS_GPIO=m
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS=y
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TIMER=m
>>  CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_HEARTBEAT=m
>> +CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_DEFAULT_ON=y
>
> Can this be module like rest of the triggers? It will come on later, but
> not sure if you care about the difference that much. Having it a module
> will be better for those boards that don't need it.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
>

Yes, module is OK here.