linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/12] ASoC: dapm: Implement stereo mixer control support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGb2v673TH0dw15wL6W6-i7tqu245epu22MxpEkjQuNHTBhnJw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:20:14 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/12] ASoC: dapm: Implement stereo mixer control support

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:57 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:07:54PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>
>> While DAPM is mono or single channel, its controls can be shared between
>> widgets, such as sharing one stereo mixer control between the left and
>> right channel widgets.
>
>> This patch introduces support for such shared mixer controls.
>
> Based on this changelog I'm really not sure what the intended semantic
> of this change is which makes it difficult to review.  What are you
> expecting these controls to look like and how are you expecting them to
> work?
>
>> -static void dapm_set_mixer_path_status(struct snd_soc_dapm_path *p, int i)
>> +static void dapm_set_mixer_path_status(struct snd_soc_dapm_path *p, int i,
>> +                                    int nth_path)
>
> It looks like the goal is to attach more than one path to a single
> control somehow?

Correct. I'll try to expand the commit log and add an example diagram.

ChenYu