linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] firmware: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:01:24 -0700
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
To:     Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
        Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@...com>,
        Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@...com>, Andrew Davis <afd@...com>,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        Russ Dill <Russ.Dill@...com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] firmware: Add support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol driver

Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com> writes:

> On 19/10/16 02:08, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Version 4 of the series is basically a rebase to v4.9-rc1, no functional
>> changes.
>
> Any final comments on this series, or shall I send a pull-req forward?
> Very minimal changes compared to v3 so should be good to go imo.

Not a comment on the series, but a question on TI-SCI.

Will the uC firmware be open like it was on AM335x?

Kevin