[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <58123214.1090405@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:57:56 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Pantelis Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] of: Remove unused variable overlay_symbols
On 10/27/16 09:53, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 10/27/16 09:27, Frank Rowand wrote:
>> On 10/27/16 07:41, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
>>> Hi Frank,
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 23:59 , frowand.list@...il.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>
>>>>
>>>> This unused variable is a reminder that symbols in overlays are
>>>> not available to subsequent overlays. If such a feature is
>>>> desired then there are several ways it could be implemented.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please don’t apply that. There’s a patch that actually imports
>>> the symbol table from overlays that subsequent operations
>>> work.
>>>
>>> Please see:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9104701/
>>
>> Thanks for the pointer! When the import symbols patch is applied
>> then the comment in my patch header becomes incorrect. I will
>> change the patch comment to act is if the import symbols patch
>> is in place.
>>
>> But the node pointer that my patch removes is still not used
>> for anything, even if the import symbols patch is applied.
>>
>> Am I missing something?
>
> I was missing a later patch in the symbol import patch set that
> updated resolver.c to use the imported symbols. I'll go look
> at that.
Crap. I misread the file name in the patch that I thought was
updating resolver.c. It was actually overlay.c. So I am back
to my question of:
Am I missing something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists