[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e40bbb4-1955-8432-e12a-690c924ccd5d@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:57:21 -0700
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
To: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
LKLM <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] LSM: security module information improvements
On 10/27/2016 03:32 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>> Create interfaces that make it possible to deal with process
>> attributes in the face of multiple "major" security modules.
>
> We don't have support for multiple major modules currently (perhaps ever),
> so I'm not merging infrastructure which is only useful for them.
>
>>
>> Patch 1/3 adds /sys/kernel/security/lsm, which provides
>> a list of the active security modules on the system.
>>
>> $ cat /sys/kernel/security/lsm
>> capability,yama,loadpin,smack
>
> This may make sense on its own. Has anyone requested this, or is likely
> to adopt it into a distro?
>
>
This is quite useful and Ubuntu will likely adopt it for the 17.04 release
Powered by blists - more mailing lists