lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <09eb61b9-d66e-838e-2411-d787fda65096@ti.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:51:03 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
CC:     Axel Haslam <ahaslam@...libre.com>,
        Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] ARM: DTS: da850: Add cfgchip syscon node

On Wednesday 26 October 2016 09:38 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 10/25/2016 10:06 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>> Add a syscon node for the SoC CFGCHIPn registers. This is needed for
>> the new usb phy driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi | 4 ++++
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> index f79e1b9..6bbf20d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/da850.dtsi
>> @@ -188,6 +188,10 @@
>>              };
>>
>>          };
>> +        cfgchip: cfgchip@...7c {
> 
> I wonder if there is a more generic name instead of cfgchip@. Is there a
> preferred generic name for syscon nodes?

I did not find anything in ePAPR, but chip-controller might be more
appropriate.

> 
>> +            compatible = "ti,da830-cfgchip", "syscon";

Looks like we need "simple-mfd" too in the compatible list?

I think we can also fold patch 5/5 into this patch and add the cfgchip
along with USB phy child node included.

If you respin the patch, I can drop 4/5 and 5/5 that I have queued and
included the updated patch instead.

Thanks,
Sekhar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ