[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161028093959.GA7889@wunner.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:39:59 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Functional dependencies between devices
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 08:19:27PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> I'm trying to using this patch set to solve the functional dependency
> between devices and irqchip, which are both ACPI platform devices.
> irqchip needs to be probed before the devices connecting to them,
> which specifically, it's the mbi-gen support I send out recently:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/25/453
>
> But I didn't see an example to do so in this patch set, and seems that
> some extra code needs to be added for that purpose, could you give me
> some suggestions for how to do that then I can work on and test against
> your patch set?
If the consumers can detect that there's a consumer on which they depend,
you could call device_link_add() from their ->probe hook.
Generally the earliest point in time when device links can be added is
after device_initialize() has been called for the consumer and device_add()
has been called for the supplier. (At least that's my understanding.)
HTH,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists