[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161028104929.GA31026@e105326-lin>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 11:49:29 +0100
From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Srinath Sridharan <srinathsr@...gle.com>,
Andres Oportus <andresoportus@...gle.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Chris Redpath <chris.redpath@....com>,
Robin Randhawa <robin.randhawa@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/8] SchedTune: central, scheduler-driven,
power-perfomance control
On 27-Oct 22:58, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:41:00PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> >
> > This RFC is an update to the initial SchedTune proposal [1] for a central
> > scheduler-driven power-performance control.
> > The posting is being made ahead of the LPC to facilitate discussions there.
>
> This is weeks too late for that. There is literally no time left to look
> at any of this before LPC.
Hi Peter, apologies. Yes, the timing is clearly off.
However, I wanted to post it anyway before LPC so that the code is available
and I can try hard to see if there will be a chance to describe aims and
architecture at the conference.
If that doesn't work out, I'll resort to list discussion after LPC,
which I'm still happy to do.
Cheers Patrick
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists