[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161028122123.24i3synevehn6r3p@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 14:21:23 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: "Luc, Piotr" <Piotr.Luc@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"he.chen@...ux.intel.com" <he.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Kang, Luwei" <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpuid: expose AVX512_4VNNIW and AVX512_4FMAPS
features to kvm guest
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:07:21PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> cpuid_count_edx would be just
>
> static inline unsigned int cpuid_count_edx(unsigned op, unsigned count)
> {
> unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>
> cpuid_count(op, count, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>
> return edx;
> }
Even better.
But shouldn't this be hiding unimplemented CPUID bits from the guest?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists