[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jpgmvhp9mmx.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:29:42 -0400
From: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
To: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86: emulate fxsave and fxrstor
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> writes:
> 2016-10-26 20:17-0400, Bandan Das:
>> Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com> writes:
>> ...
>>> +static int check_fxsr(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 eax = 1, ebx, ecx = 0, edx;
>>> +
>>> + ctxt->ops->get_cpuid(ctxt, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>>> + if (!(edx & FFL(FXSR)))
>>> + return emulate_ud(ctxt);
>>> +
>>> + if (ctxt->ops->get_cr(ctxt, 0) & (X86_CR0_TS | X86_CR0_EM))
>>> + return emulate_nm(ctxt);
>>> +
>>> + return X86EMUL_CONTINUE;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/*
>>> + * FXSAVE and FXRSTOR have 3 different formats depending on execution mode,
>>> + * 1) non-64-bit mode
>>> + * 2) 64-bit mode with REX.W prefix
>>> + * 3) 64-bit mode without REX.W prefix
>>> + *
>>> + * Emulation uses (3) for for (1) mode because only the number of XMM registers
>>> + * is different.
>>> + */
> | [...]
>>> +
>>> +static int em_fxrstor(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>>> +{
>>> + char fx_state[512] __aligned(16);
>>> + int rc;
>>> +
>>> + rc = check_fxsr(ctxt);
>>
>> Is this check enough here ? What I mean is that is it possible that the memory
>> image that is read from has data in an invalid format/corrupt or is that irrelevant ?
>
> No, it is not enough, v2 will need testing on bare metal. :)
>
> Nadav mentioned that MXCSR could thrown #GP when setting bits 16-32.
Yeah, this was what I am wondering about. Whether, there are obvious ways
for the guest to abuse the path, you know, common emulator code concerns.
> And there are actually 4 different formats: 16 bit mode has only 16 bit
> FIP, and other 16 bits are reserved, but KVM's fxrstor would be loading
> all 32 bits, so the reserved upper 16 should be cleared beforehand.
> The structure has a lot of reserved fields, but they should just be
> ignored by the CPU.
Ok.
> Did you notice other problems?
Rest looks fine to me even with the #ifdefs that you don't prefer but
I will be sure to take another look when you post a v2.
> Thanks.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists