linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2] clk: xgene: Don't call _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <83c41979-96a0-27bb-4e5a-329396ab296a@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:09:47 -0700
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:     Loc Ho <lho@....com>
Cc:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] clk: xgene: Don't call __pa on ioremaped address

On 10/28/2016 10:07 AM, Loc Ho wrote:
> Hi Laura,
>
>> ioremaped addresses are not linearly mapped so the physical
>> address can not be figured out via __pa. More generally, there
>> is no guarantee that backing value of an ioremapped address
>> is a physical address at all. The value here is only used
>> for debugging so just drop the call to __pa on the ioremapped
>> address.
>>
>> Fixes: 6ae5fd381251 ("clk: xgene: Silence sparse warnings")
>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Fix up one more format string
>>
>> I put the fixes tag to match with the cleanup that was done.
>> If there is interest in this fix for pre-4.2 kernels for
>> stable, I can submit a patch for that as well.
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c | 10 ++++------
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c b/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> index 3433132..1e67655 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-xgene.c
>> @@ -243,22 +243,20 @@ static int xgene_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>         struct xgene_clk *pclk = to_xgene_clk(hw);
>>         unsigned long flags = 0;
>>         u32 data;
>> -       phys_addr_t reg;
>>
>>         if (pclk->lock)
>>                 spin_lock_irqsave(pclk->lock, flags);
>>
>>         if (pclk->param.csr_reg != NULL) {
>>                 pr_debug("%s clock enabled\n", clk_hw_get_name(hw));
>> -               reg = __pa(pclk->param.csr_reg);
>>                 /* First enable the clock */
>>                 data = xgene_clk_read(pclk->param.csr_reg +
>>                                         pclk->param.reg_clk_offset);
>>                 data |= pclk->param.reg_clk_mask;
>>                 xgene_clk_write(data, pclk->param.csr_reg +
>>                                         pclk->param.reg_clk_offset);
>> -               pr_debug("%s clock PADDR base %pa clk offset 0x%08X mask 0x%08X value 0x%08X\n",
>> -                       clk_hw_get_name(hw), &reg,
>> +               pr_debug("%s clk offset 0x%08X mask 0x%08X value 0x%08X\n",
>> +                       clk_hw_get_name(hw),
>>                         pclk->param.reg_clk_offset, pclk->param.reg_clk_mask,
>>                         data);
>>
>> @@ -268,8 +266,8 @@ static int xgene_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
>>                 data &= ~pclk->param.reg_csr_mask;
>>                 xgene_clk_write(data, pclk->param.csr_reg +
>>                                         pclk->param.reg_csr_offset);
>> -               pr_debug("%s CSR RESET PADDR base %pa csr offset 0x%08X mask 0x%08X value 0x%08X\n",
>> -                       clk_hw_get_name(hw), &reg,
>> +               pr_debug("%s csr offset 0x%08X mask 0x%08X value 0x%08X\n",
>> +                       clk_hw_get_name(hw),
>>                         pclk->param.reg_csr_offset, pclk->param.reg_csr_mask,
>>                         data);
>>         }
>
>
> The code looks fine to me. May be overly cautious here. Do you have a
> board to test this out?
>
> -Loc
>

Yes, that was how I caught the problem. There are no errors that I
can see with this patch applied.

Thanks,
Laura