linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Re: [PATCH 08/15] perf tools: Introduce timestamp_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2016 10:46:42 -0700
From:   Joonwoo Park <joonwoop@...eaurora.org>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Re: [PATCH 08/15] perf tools: Introduce
 timestamp_in_usec()



On 10/28/2016 10:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>> Em Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:30:41AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>> Em Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 10:53:38AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>>>> Em Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 04:14:55PM -0700, Joonwoo Park escreveu:
>>>>> Hmm.. I didn't ACK this patch because of bug I commented at
>>>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1256724.html
>>
>>>>> s/work_list->max_lat/work_list->max_lat_at/
>>
>>>> Sorry about that, I took the "thanks for taking care of this" as an ack,
>>>> now that I re-read that message I saw your points later on in that
>>>> e-mail.

No worries.  I think I could be more specific with the first part of 
comment by mentioning about the bug.

>>
>>>> Since Ingo hasn't pulled this, I'll try fixing it, will check that other
>>>> naming issue,
>>
>>> So, here is how it ended up, it fixes the problem you pointed out and
>>> renames the function to follow the scnprintf() convention, as used
>>> elsewhere in tools/perf (tools/perf/util/annotate.h has several
>>> examples).
>>
>> Ingo, I've just signed a perf-core-for-mingo-20161028 with the only
>> change being the patch below, re-run my tests, I think this doesn't
>> introduce any bugs and addresses Joonwoo's concerns, please consider
>> pulling.
>
> Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!

Thanks!

Joonwoo

>
> 	Ingo
>